Category Archives: Autism

Autism

Learning in Layers Autism style

Leave a comment

Understanding the Autistic Brain: Learning in Layers and the Necessity of Routine

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is characterized by unique differences in social communication, behavior, and cognitive functions. One key aspect of understanding these differences is recognizing how the autistic brain learns and compensates for impairments. This post explores the concept of learning in layers, the critical role of routine and consistency, and the impact of environmental stability on the autistic brain’s ability to process and retain information.

Learning in Layers: Building Understanding Incrementally

Learning in Layers is a crucial concept for understanding how autistic individuals process information. This approach involves breaking down learning into smaller, manageable steps and building upon each layer incrementally. Here’s why it works:

  1. Structured Learning: Autistic individuals often thrive in structured environments where tasks are broken down into clear, sequential steps. This method reduces cognitive load and allows for gradual, cumulative learning.
  2. Incremental Understanding: Each layer of learning builds on the previous one, ensuring that foundational knowledge is solid before moving on to more complex concepts. This helps in retaining information and making connections between different pieces of knowledge.

The Role of Routine and Consistency

Routine and consistency are vital for the autistic brain to effectively learn and apply the concept of learning in layers. Here’s how routine supports learning:

  1. Filtering Out Unnecessary Data: A consistent routine helps the autistic brain filter out unnecessary data. When the environment and daily activities are predictable, the brain can focus on learning and retaining new information instead of being distracted by changes and new stimuli.
  2. Building Reliable Patterns: Repetition solidifies learning. When routines are followed consistently over time, the brain starts to recognize patterns and builds reliable neural pathways. This consistency is crucial for information to stick and become part of the long-term memory.
  3. Avoiding Setbacks: Inconsistency can disrupt learning. For instance, following a routine for three days and then changing it on the fourth day can cause setbacks. Each time there is a change, the autistic brain may need to start over, making it difficult for learning to progress smoothly.

The Impact of Environmental Stability

The human brain, particularly the autistic brain, seeks balance and symbiosis. It functions like a learning machine, much like a computer that needs precise conditions to operate correctly. Environmental stability is crucial for maintaining this balance:

  1. Minimizing Cognitive Load: A stable environment reduces the cognitive load on the autistic brain. When there are fewer unexpected changes, the brain can allocate more resources to processing and retaining new information rather than managing the stress of unpredictability.
  2. Fine-Tuning the Environment: Consistency allows the brain to fine-tune its understanding of the environment. Over time, the brain becomes more efficient at navigating familiar settings, which further supports learning and adaptation.
  3. Enhancing Memory Retention: Stable routines help reinforce learning. When the same activities and patterns are repeated consistently, they are more likely to be encoded into long-term memory, making it easier for the autistic individual to recall and apply learned information.

The Consequences of Disrupted Routine

When routine and consistency are not maintained, the autistic brain can go into a state of fight-or-flight for self-preservation. During these periods:

  1. Fight-or-Flight Mode: The brain perceives the inconsistency as a threat, triggering a stress response that focuses on survival rather than learning.
  2. Impaired Learning: No meaningful learning happens during this time because the brain is unable to process new information effectively. The focus shifts entirely to managing the perceived threat.
  3. Increased Anxiety: The lack of routine and predictability increases anxiety and stress, making it even harder for the brain to function normally and return to a state where learning can occur.

Conclusion

The autistic brain, like any human brain, strives for balance and symbiosis. It functions as a learning machine that requires precise conditions to operate optimally. Understanding the importance of routine and consistency in the context of learning in layers is crucial for supporting autistic individuals. A structured, predictable environment helps the autistic brain filter out unnecessary data, build reliable patterns, and retain information more effectively. By minimizing disruptions and maintaining a stable routine, we can create an optimal learning environment that allows the autistic brain to thrive and develop its full potential.

Key Takeaways:

  • Learning in Layers: Breaks down complex tasks into manageable steps, building understanding incrementally.
  • Routine and Consistency: Essential for filtering out unnecessary data and reinforcing learning.
  • Environmental Stability: Reduces cognitive load, enhances memory retention, and supports fine-tuning of the brain’s understanding of its surroundings.
  • Fight-or-Flight Mode: Disruptions to routine can trigger stress responses, preventing effective learning and increasing anxiety.
  • Balance and Symbiosis: The autistic brain, like a computer, needs precise conditions to operate effectively, highlighting the need for consistency and stability in the learning environment.

By recognizing and implementing these principles, we can better support the learning and development of autistic individuals, helping them navigate their world with greater ease and confidence.

The Role of Routine and Consistency in Learning for the Autistic Brain: A Theoretical Analysis

Abstract

This paper explores the hypothesis that routine and consistency are crucial for the autistic brain to effectively learn and compensate for impairments associated with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). We propose that learning in layers, supported by a structured and predictable environment, enables autistic individuals to build understanding incrementally. Additionally, a higher Intelligence Quotient (IQ), indicative of greater cognitive processing speed and capacity, allows for more effective compensation of autism-related challenges. However, during periods of fatigue, illness, hunger, or sensory overload, the cognitive resources available for compensation diminish, leading to more pronounced autistic symptoms. This paper provides a theoretical framework to understand how routine, consistency, and IQ influence the ability to manage autism-related impairments.

Introduction

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is characterized by a range of social, communicative, and behavioral impairments. Routine and consistency play a vital role in the learning process of individuals with autism, allowing for incremental learning and reducing cognitive load. This paper examines the relationship between learning in layers, routine and consistency, and the ability to compensate for autism-related impairments. We propose that a stable environment, combined with higher IQ, facilitates better compensation due to enhanced cognitive processing capabilities. Conversely, factors such as fatigue, illness, hunger, and sensory overload reduce the brain’s capacity to leverage these cognitive resources, exacerbating autistic symptoms.

Methods

This theoretical framework is based on established principles of neuropsychology and cognitive science, incorporating concepts of synaptic pruning, cognitive load theory, and the significance of routine and sameness in autism. We compare the compensatory abilities of individuals with varying IQ levels, considering the role of cognitive processing speed and capacity in managing autism-related impairments. We also explore the impact of fatigue, illness, hunger, sensory overload, and comorbidities on these compensatory mechanisms.

Results

Assumptions:

  • Learning in Layers: Autistic individuals benefit from building their understanding in incremental steps, where each new layer builds on previous knowledge (Bölte et al., 2014).
  • IQ and Cognitive Processing Speed: Higher IQ is associated with faster and more efficient cognitive processing (Deary et al., 2010).
  • Compensation Mechanisms: Individuals with higher IQ can better compensate for autism-related impairments due to superior problem-solving and adaptive abilities (Happe & Frith, 2006).
  • Impact of Fatigue and Other Factors: Fatigue, illness, hunger, or sensory overload reduce cognitive processing capacity, leading to diminished compensatory abilities and more pronounced autistic symptoms (Courchesne et al., 2011).
  • Comorbidities: Additional conditions like ADHD and dyslexia further reduce the brain’s available cognitive resources, necessitating greater energy for compensation (Gillberg, 2010).
  • Environmental Factors: Routine and sameness reduce cognitive load by providing structure and predictability, essential for autistic individuals (Vanegas & Davidson, 2015).

Hypothetical Scenarios:

High IQ Individual with Autism Only:

  • Compensatory Ability: High due to faster processing speed and greater cognitive capacity.
  • Impact of Fatigue and Other Factors: Significant reduction in compensatory ability, leading to increased autism-related impairments when fatigued, ill, hungry, or overstimulated.
  • Learning in Layers: Allows for structured learning and incremental understanding, enhancing the ability to compensate for impairments.

High IQ Individual with Autism and Comorbidities (e.g., ADHD, Dyslexia):

  • Compensatory Ability: Reduced compared to individuals with autism only, due to the need to compensate for multiple conditions.
  • Impact of Fatigue and Other Factors: Greater reduction in compensatory ability, leading to more pronounced impairments. The brain’s “battery life” is shorter due to the increased energy demand from multiple conditions.
  • Learning in Layers: Helps manage cognitive load by breaking down complex tasks into smaller, more manageable steps.

Low IQ Individual with Autism Only:

  • Compensatory Ability: Lower due to slower processing speed and reduced cognitive capacity.
  • Impact of Fatigue and Other Factors: Compensatory ability remains relatively stable as baseline compensatory mechanisms are already limited.
  • Learning in Layers: Crucial for building understanding and managing cognitive load.

Low IQ Individual with Autism and Comorbidities (e.g., ADHD, Dyslexia):

  • Compensatory Ability: Severely limited due to lower cognitive capacity and the need to manage multiple conditions.
  • Impact of Fatigue and Other Factors: Minimal reduction in already limited compensatory abilities.
  • Learning in Layers: Essential for maintaining any level of understanding and functioning.

Discussion

Cognitive Load and Learning in Layers

  • High IQ: Allows individuals to adapt quickly, develop complex strategies, and utilize advanced problem-solving skills. Learning in layers supports these abilities by providing a structured approach to understanding (Deary et al., 2010).
  • Low IQ: Individuals may struggle with slower adaptation and limited compensatory strategies. Learning in layers is vital for building understanding incrementally (Happe & Frith, 2006).

Environmental Factors

  • Routine and Sameness: Reduce cognitive load by providing predictability and structure. This is particularly important for autistic individuals who benefit from a stable environment (Vanegas & Davidson, 2015).
  • Impact of Fatigue, Illness, Hunger, and Sensory Overload: These factors can significantly impact cognitive resources, reducing the ability to compensate for impairments. The brain prioritizes basic survival and efficiency, further limiting compensatory abilities (Courchesne et al., 2011).

Synaptic Pruning and Cognitive Load Theory

  • Synaptic Pruning: Differences in synaptic pruning in autistic individuals can affect neural efficiency. Learning in layers helps accommodate these differences by allowing incremental understanding (Huttenlocher, 2002).
  • Cognitive Load Theory: Managing cognitive load is crucial for autistic individuals. Learning in layers and a structured environment help reduce cognitive demands, enabling better compensation for impairments (Sweller, 1988).

Fight-or-Flight Response When routine and consistency are not maintained, the autistic brain can enter a state of fight-or-flight for self-preservation:

  • Fight-or-Flight Mode: The brain perceives inconsistency as a threat, triggering a stress response that focuses on survival rather than learning (Kern et al., 2007).
  • Impaired Learning: No meaningful learning happens during this time because the brain is unable to process new information effectively. The focus shifts entirely to managing the perceived threat.
  • Increased Anxiety: The lack of routine and predictability increases anxiety and stress, making it even harder for the brain to function normally and return to a state where learning can occur (Van Hecke et al., 2009).

Conclusion

The autistic brain, like any human brain, strives for balance and symbiosis. It functions as a learning machine that requires precise conditions to operate optimally. Understanding the importance of routine and consistency in the context of learning in layers is crucial for supporting autistic individuals. A structured, predictable environment helps the autistic brain filter out unnecessary data, build reliable patterns, and retain information more effectively. By minimizing disruptions and maintaining a stable routine, we can create an optimal learning environment that allows the autistic brain to thrive and develop its full potential.

Key Takeaways

  • Learning in Layers: Breaks down complex tasks into manageable steps, building understanding incrementally.
  • Routine and Consistency: Essential for filtering out unnecessary data and reinforcing learning.
  • Environmental Stability: Reduces cognitive load, enhances memory retention, and supports fine-tuning of the brain’s understanding of its surroundings.
  • Fight-or-Flight Mode: Disruptions to routine can trigger stress responses, preventing effective learning and increasing anxiety.
  • Balance and Symbiosis: The autistic brain, like a computer, needs precise conditions to operate effectively, highlighting the need for consistency and stability in the learning environment.

References

  • Bölte, S., Westerwald, E., Holtmann, M., Freitag, C., & Poustka, F. (2014). Autistic traits and autism spectrum disorders: The clinical validity of two measures presuming a continuum of social communication skills. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(1), 66-72.
  • Courchesne, E., Campbell, K., & Solso, S. (2011). Brain growth across the life span in autism: Age-specific changes in anatomical pathology. Brain Research, 1380, 138-145.
  • Deary, I. J., Penke, L., & Johnson, W. (2010). The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(3), 201-211.
  • Gillberg, C. (2010). The ESSENCE in child psychiatry: Early symptomatic syndromes eliciting neurodevelopmental clinical examinations. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(6), 1543-1551.
  • Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 5-25.
  • Huttenlocher, P. R. (2002). Neural Plasticity: The Effects of Environment on the Development of the Cerebral Cortex. Harvard University Press.
  • Kern, J. K., Geier, D. A., Sykes, L. K., Geier, M. R., & Deth, R. C. (2007). Are ASD and ADHD a continuum? Preliminary evidence from a large-scale population study. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 19(4), 239-247.
  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
  • Van Hecke, A. V., Mundy, P. C., Acra, C. F., Block, J. J., Delgado, C. E. F., Parlade, M. V., … & Pomares, Y. B. (2009). Infant joint attention, temperament, and social competence in preschool children. Child Development, 78(1), 53-69.
  • Vanegas, S. B., & Davidson, D. (2015). Investigating distinct and related contributions of weak central coherence, executive dysfunction, and social deficits to autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(3), 831-844.

By recognizing and implementing these principles, we can better support the learning and development of autistic individuals, helping them navigate their world with greater ease and confidence.

Autism

Autistic IQ and Compensation

Leave a comment

The Role of IQ in Compensating for Autism-Related Impairments: A Theoretical Analysis

Abstract

This paper explores the hypothesis that the Intelligence Quotient (IQ) plays a significant role in compensating for impairments associated with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). We propose that a higher IQ, indicative of greater cognitive processing speed and capacity, allows for more effective compensation of autism-related challenges. However, during periods of fatigue, illness, hunger, or sensory overload, the cognitive resources available for compensation diminish, leading to more pronounced autistic symptoms. Additionally, the presence of comorbidities such as ADHD and dyslexia further impacts the brain’s compensatory abilities. This paper provides a theoretical framework to understand how IQ influences the ability to manage autism-related impairments, highlighting the variability in support needs based on fluctuating daily factors.

Introduction

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is characterized by a range of social, communicative, and behavioral impairments. Intelligence Quotient (IQ), a measure of cognitive abilities, varies widely among individuals with autism. This paper examines the relationship between IQ and the ability to compensate for autism-related impairments. We propose that higher IQ facilitates better compensation due to enhanced cognitive processing capabilities, akin to the superior performance of a high-powered gaming computer. Conversely, fatigue, illness, hunger, sensory overload, and comorbidities reduce the brain’s capacity to leverage these cognitive resources, exacerbating autistic symptoms. The variability of these factors leads to fluctuating support needs, which complicates the classification of autism severity levels.

Methods

This theoretical framework is based on established principles of neuropsychology and cognitive science. We compare the compensatory abilities of individuals with varying IQ levels, considering the role of cognitive processing speed and capacity in managing autism-related impairments. We also explore the impact of fatigue, illness, hunger, sensory overload, and comorbidities on these compensatory mechanisms.

Results

Assumptions:

  • IQ and Cognitive Processing Speed: Higher IQ is associated with faster and more efficient cognitive processing.
  • Compensation Mechanisms: Individuals with higher IQ can better compensate for autism-related impairments due to superior problem-solving and adaptive abilities.
  • Impact of Fatigue and Other Factors: Fatigue, illness, hunger, or sensory overload reduce cognitive processing capacity, leading to diminished compensatory abilities and more pronounced autistic symptoms.
  • Comorbidities: Additional conditions like ADHD and dyslexia further reduce the brain’s available cognitive resources, necessitating greater energy for compensation.

Hypothetical Scenarios

  • High IQ Individual with Autism Only:
    • Compensatory Ability: High due to faster processing speed and greater cognitive capacity.
    • Impact of Fatigue and Other Factors: Significant reduction in compensatory ability, leading to increased autism-related impairments when fatigued, ill, hungry, or overstimulated.
  • High IQ Individual with Autism and Comorbidities (e.g., ADHD, Dyslexia):
    • Compensatory Ability: Reduced compared to individuals with autism only, due to the need to compensate for multiple conditions.
    • Impact of Fatigue and Other Factors: Greater reduction in compensatory ability, leading to more pronounced impairments. The brain’s “battery life” is shorter due to the increased energy demand from multiple conditions.

Cognitive Load and Processing Speed

High IQ

A higher IQ correlates with increased cognitive processing speed and capacity. This allows individuals to:

  • Quickly adapt to changing social contexts.
  • Develop complex strategies to manage sensory and communicative challenges.
  • Utilize advanced problem-solving skills to navigate daily tasks.

Low IQ

Individuals with lower IQ may struggle with:

  • Slower adaptation to social and environmental changes.
  • Limited development of compensatory strategies.
  • Basic problem-solving skills, leading to greater reliance on external support.

Fatigue, Illness, Hunger, Sensory Overload, Comorbidities, and Cognitive Resources

High IQ and Additional Factors

  • Baseline State: Effective compensation due to high cognitive resources.
  • State with Additional Factors: Significant reduction in available cognitive resources, leading to:
    • Slower processing speed.
    • Reduced ability to employ compensatory strategies.
    • Increased visibility of autism-related impairments.
    • Prioritization of basic survival and efficiency over cognitive processing, further reducing IQ-related compensatory abilities.

High IQ with Comorbidities

  • Baseline State: Reduced compensatory ability due to the need to manage multiple conditions.
  • State with Additional Factors: Even greater reduction in available cognitive resources, leading to:
    • Severe decrease in processing speed.
    • Minimal capacity to employ compensatory strategies.
    • Highly pronounced autistic symptoms.

Low IQ and Additional Factors

  • Baseline State: Limited compensation due to lower cognitive resources.
  • State with Additional Factors: Minor reduction in cognitive resources, resulting in:
    • Slight decrease in already limited compensatory abilities.
    • Autistic symptoms remain consistently pronounced.
    • Basic survival and efficiency processes take precedence, further limiting cognitive capacity for compensation.

Conclusion

This theoretical analysis suggests that IQ plays a critical role in the ability of individuals with autism to compensate for their impairments. Higher IQ provides greater cognitive resources, enabling more effective management of autism-related challenges. However, factors such as fatigue, illness, hunger, sensory overload, and comorbidities significantly impact these compensatory abilities, leading to more pronounced symptoms. The variability of these factors from day to day underscores the fluctuating support needs of autistic individuals and challenges the fixed classification of autism severity levels. Understanding the interplay between IQ, cognitive processing, and these additional factors is essential for developing targeted support strategies for individuals with autism.

References

  1. Baron-Cohen, S., & Belmonte, M. K. (2005). Autism: A window onto the development of the social and the analytic brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 109-126.
  2. Courchesne, E., Campbell, K., & Solso, S. (2011). Brain growth across the life span in autism: Age-specific changes in anatomical pathology. Brain Research, 1380, 138-145.
  3. Fombonne, E. (2009). Epidemiology of pervasive developmental disorders. Pediatric Research, 65(6), 591-598.
  4. Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 5-25.
  5. Johnson, M. H., & Munakata, Y. (2005). Processes of change in brain and cognitive development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(3), 152-158.
Autism

Voltage and The Brain

Leave a comment

Comparative Analysis of Neuronal Voltage and Energy Demand in Autistic and Non-Autistic Brains

Abstract

This paper explores the hypothesis that autistic brains, potentially containing a higher number of neurons, generate greater overall electrical activity compared to non-autistic brains. This increased neural activity may result in higher energy demands, which, when unmet, could exacerbate autistic symptoms due to the brain’s diminished capacity to function at full cognitive capacity. This paper provides a theoretical framework to understand the implications of higher neuronal density and energy requirements in autistic individuals.

Introduction

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is characterized by differences in social communication, behavior, and cognitive functions. Emerging evidence suggests that structural and functional differences in the brains of autistic individuals may underpin these characteristics. One proposed difference is the increased number of neurons in certain brain regions of autistic individuals, which may contribute to differences in neural activity and energy consumption. This paper aims to explore the potential relationship between neuronal density, electrical activity, and energy demands in autistic and non-autistic brains.

Methods

The theoretical framework presented here is based on established principles of neurophysiology, particularly the relationship between neuronal activity, voltage generation, and energy consumption. We compare the hypothetical total voltage and energy requirements of non-autistic and autistic brains by assuming specific values for neuron count, average neuron voltage, and energy consumption per action potential.

Results

Assumptions:

  • Average neuron voltage during activity: 50mV
  • Neuron count in a non-autistic brain: N=86N = 86N=86 billion
  • Hypothetical increase in neuron count in an autistic brain: ΔN=1\Delta N = 1ΔN=1 billion
  • Energy required per action potential: E=1E = 1E=1 unit

Calculations:

  • Total Voltage in Non-Autistic Brain: Vnon−autistic=N×50mV=86×109×50mV=4.3×1012mVV_{non-autistic} = N \times 50mV = 86 \times 10^9 \times 50mV = 4.3 \times 10^{12} mVVnon−autistic​=N×50mV=86×109×50mV=4.3×1012mV
  • Total Voltage in Autistic Brain: Vautistic=(N+ΔN)×50mV=(86×109+1×109)×50mV=4.35×1012mVV_{autistic} = (N + \Delta N) \times 50mV = (86 \times 10^9 + 1 \times 10^9) \times 50mV = 4.35 \times 10^{12} mVVautistic​=(N+ΔN)×50mV=(86×109+1×109)×50mV=4.35×1012mV
  • Energy Consumption in Non-Autistic Brain: Enon−autistic=N×E=86×109×1=86×109 units of energyE_{non-autistic} = N \times E = 86 \times 10^9 \times 1 = 86 \times 10^9 \text{ units of energy}Enon−autistic​=N×E=86×109×1=86×109 units of energy
  • Energy Consumption in Autistic Brain: Eautistic=(N+ΔN)×E=(86×109+1×109)×1=87×109 units of energyE_{autistic} = (N + \Delta N) \times E = (86 \times 10^9 + 1 \times 10^9) \times 1 = 87 \times 10^9 \text{ units of energy}Eautistic​=(N+ΔN)×E=(86×109+1×109)×1=87×109 units of energy

Discussion

The increased neuronal count in autistic brains suggests a higher total voltage and greater energy demand. The calculations show that the total voltage and energy requirements for the autistic brain are marginally higher than those of the non-autistic brain. This implies that the autistic brain may need more energy to maintain its functions, especially during periods of high cognitive load or stress. When the energy demand exceeds supply, cognitive functions may be compromised, leading to more pronounced autistic symptoms.

Conclusion

This theoretical analysis highlights the potential for increased neuronal activity and energy demands in autistic brains. Understanding these differences is crucial for developing strategies to manage cognitive load and improve the quality of life for autistic individuals. Further empirical research is needed to validate these hypotheses and elucidate the exact mechanisms involved.

References

  1. Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, T. M. (2000). Principles of Neural Science (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  2. Gage, F. H., & Temple, S. (2013). Neural stem cells: Generating and regenerating the brain. Neuron, 80(3), 588-601.
  3. Courchesne, E., Campbell, K., & Solso, S. (2011). Brain growth across the life span in autism: Age-specific changes in anatomical pathology. Brain Research, 1380, 138-145.
  4. Polleux, F., & Lauder, J. M. (2004). Toward a developmental neurobiology of autism. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 10(4), 303-317.
  5. Geschwind, D. H., & Levitt, P. (2007). Autism spectrum disorders: Developmental disconnection syndromes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17(1), 103-111.
Autism

Faces Lie

Leave a comment

Faces Lie: Why I Don’t Look at Faces

From a young age, neurodivergent individuals, particularly those on the autism spectrum, often develop a unique perspective on social interactions and communication. One behavior that frequently draws attention and misunderstanding is the tendency to avoid looking at faces. This behavior is commonly misinterpreted as a lack of interest or an inability to engage socially. However, the reality is far more complex and deeply rooted in the nuanced ways we process and respond to visual and emotional information. This article delves into the reasons behind this behavior, challenges common misconceptions, and highlights the importance of direct and honest communication.

The Disconnect Between Words and Faces

One of the primary reasons neurodivergent individuals avoid looking at faces is the frequent inconsistency between what people say and what their facial expressions convey. For example, someone might insist that “nothing is wrong” while their face shows clear signs of distress. These mixed signals create confusion and frustration. For many autistic individuals, this disconnect becomes apparent early in life, leading them to distrust facial expressions that do not match spoken words.

The Importance of Internal Understanding

Many neurodivergent individuals, including myself, have a highly visual internal world. Our understanding and interpretation of the external world heavily rely on visual consistency. When examining our surroundings, we need to ensure that they match our internal visual representation. This process extends to understanding people and their emotions. If faces do not align with the spoken word, they lose their credibility and relevance. Thus, focusing on faces becomes less interesting and more of a distraction from seeking the underlying truth.

The Inefficiency of Lies

When people lie about their feelings, it wastes our effort in trying to decipher their true emotions through facial expressions. This is particularly frustrating when neurodivergent individuals are often punished or reprimanded for noticing and pointing out these discrepancies. As a result, many of us choose to divert our attention away from faces, seeking more reliable and consistent sources of information. This decision is not about a lack of empathy or social disinterest but rather a logical response to a perceived inefficiency in social communication.

Why Faces Become Uninteresting

The lack of transparency in facial expressions leads to disinterest in looking at faces. The inability to break down and understand the truth behind these expressions makes them less engaging. We prefer honesty and directness in communication, and when someone’s face says one thing while their words say another, it is seen as dishonest and not worth the effort to decipher. This preference for straightforward communication aligns with our need for clarity and consistency.

Personal Experience of Misinterpretation

This is my personal experience, and it is compounded by the fact that my own expressions are often dissected and my emotions inferred by non-autistics. When I attempt to interpret their expressions and emotions, I am frequently told that I am wrong or misled. This double standard is perplexing and frustrating. If my interpretations are deemed incorrect, then the same scrutiny should apply to the interpretations of my expressions by others. The inconsistency in how our expressions are evaluated makes little sense and adds to the difficulty of engaging with facial expressions.

Misinterpretations of Autistic Behavior

Recent studies, such as the one on abnormal visual perception in autism, highlight significant differences in how autistic individuals process visual information. These differences are often misinterpreted as social deficits. For instance, what might appear as aimless visual exploration is, in reality, a methodical process of examining the external world to ensure it matches the internal visual picture. The tendency to avoid looking at faces is not due to a lack of social interest but a logical response to the frequent dishonesty observed in facial expressions.

Social Implications

This disinterest in faces can lead to misunderstandings in social interactions, especially in a world where neurotypical people expect facial expressions to be a fundamental part of communication. Neurodivergent individuals, however, prioritize direct communication and consistency between words and actions. Understanding these different priorities can help foster more inclusive and effective communication practices.

Conclusion

Not looking at faces is a rational response to the inconsistencies and dishonesty often observed in facial expressions. For neurodivergent individuals, this behavior is rooted in a preference for direct and honest communication that aligns words with true feelings. It is crucial to challenge common misconceptions about autistic behavior and recognize the importance of providing clear, consistent communication. By doing so, we can create more inclusive social norms that respect the communication preferences of neurodivergent individuals and enhance mutual understanding and respect.

Autism

Achievement by Proxy

2 Comments

Autistic individuals are not side show exhibits to monetize.

Achievement by Proxy: Understanding and Addressing a Harmful Behavior

“Achievement by proxy” is a term I invented to describe the act of taking credit for someone else’s accomplishments. This behavior often occurs in relationships where one party, such as a friend, parent, or spouse, claims that the achiever could not have succeeded without their support or influence. Understanding the motivations behind achievement by proxy and its detrimental effects on both the perpetrator and the victim is crucial for fostering healthier relationships and personal growth.

Definition of “By Proxy”

The term “by proxy” refers to the authority to act on behalf of someone else. In the context of achievements, it implies that the credit for accomplishments is claimed by someone who assisted or supported the achiever, often overshadowing the actual effort and success of the individual.

What Achievement by Proxy Says About the Perpetrator

  1. Insecurity
    • Explanation: Individuals who engage in achievement by proxy often struggle with their own sense of self-worth and competence. By attaching themselves to another person’s success, they attempt to boost their own self-esteem.
    • Behavior: This may manifest as frequent boasting about their role in others’ achievements or downplaying the efforts of the actual achiever.
  2. Narcissism
    • Explanation: Narcissistic individuals have an excessive need for admiration and validation. Taking credit for others’ successes provides them with the recognition and praise they crave.
    • Behavior: They often dominate conversations about achievements, making it about their contributions rather than acknowledging the actual achiever.
  3. Control and Manipulation
    • Explanation: Some individuals use achievement by proxy as a means to exert control over the achiever, reinforcing a power dynamic where the achiever feels indebted or dependent.
    • Behavior: This can include reminding the achiever of their supposed contributions in moments of conflict or to manipulate the achiever’s decisions.
  4. Ulterior Motives
    • Explanation: Helping someone should come from the goodness of helping, not from a desire for control or manipulation. When help is offered with ulterior motives, it becomes about maintaining influence over the person being helped.
    • Behavior: Such individuals might frequently highlight their assistance to keep the achiever feeling obligated or dependent.

Why Achievement by Proxy Is Unhealthy for Both Parties

  1. Impact on the Achiever
    • Loss of Self-Worth: The achiever’s sense of accomplishment is undermined, leading to feelings of inadequacy and diminished self-esteem.
    • Emotional Distress: Persistent achievement by proxy can cause frustration, resentment, and even depression or anxiety in the achiever.
    • Hindered Growth: When achievements are not fully recognized, the achiever may doubt their capabilities, stifling their personal and professional development.
  2. Impact on the Perpetrator
    • Reinforcement of Negative Traits: Engaging in achievement by proxy perpetuates insecurity and narcissistic behaviors, preventing the perpetrator from addressing their underlying issues.
    • Relationship Strain: This behavior often leads to tension and conflict within relationships, as the achiever feels undervalued and manipulated.
    • Lack of Authentic Connection: By focusing on appropriating others’ successes, the perpetrator misses out on forming genuine, supportive relationships based on mutual respect and recognition.

Addressing Achievement by Proxy

  1. For the Achiever
    • Assertive Communication: Clearly and calmly communicate the importance of recognizing individual contributions. Use “I” statements to express feelings without blaming.
    • Seeking Support: Engage with supportive friends, family members, or professional counselors who can validate the achiever’s feelings and experiences.
    • Documenting Achievements: Keep a detailed record of personal accomplishments to reinforce self-worth and provide evidence of individual efforts.
  2. For the Perpetrator
    • Self-Reflection: Encourage self-reflection to understand the motivations behind their behavior and acknowledge its impact on others.
    • Professional Help: Seek therapy or counseling to address underlying insecurities, narcissistic tendencies, or control issues.
    • Promoting Healthy Recognition: Practice giving genuine recognition and praise to others, focusing on their achievements without seeking personal validation.

Conclusion

Achievement by proxy undermines the true value of individual accomplishments and damages relationships. By understanding the psychological motivations behind this behavior and its detrimental effects, both perpetrators and victims can take steps to foster healthier, more supportive relationships. Recognizing and addressing achievement by proxy is essential for personal growth and maintaining the integrity of individual achievements.

Autism

Please share this site

2 Comments
  1 Minutes Read

Please share this site

If you can, please share this site in your country. I would like to reach as many neurodivergents as possible. The faster people read it, the sooner they will feel better and start to think better. You know it takes a long time to change our routines, so the sooner we start the faster we will get there. I would also love to hear from you! Verbal or non verbal- send video- draw a picture- however! I would love it.

Thank You!!

Autism

Occam’s Razor

Leave a comment

Interfering with Nature: The Consequences of Early Intervention on Human Civilization

Occam’s Razor, a principle attributed to the 14th-century logician and Franciscan friar William of Ockham, asserts that the simplest explanation is often the correct one. This principle has been a foundational tool in science and philosophy, guiding thinkers to avoid unnecessary complexity when formulating explanations. Applying Occam’s Razor to the discussion of autism and ADHD, we find that these neurodivergent traits are not anomalies but integral parts of human nature, designed for specific purposes.

Throughout history, human civilization has advanced through natural processes, adapting and evolving to meet the challenges of each era. However, in recent decades, there has been an increasing trend to interfere with these natural processes, particularly in the realm of developmental disorders such as autism. Early intervention strategies, especially Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), have been widely adopted with the intention of helping autistic individuals adapt to societal norms. While these intentions may be well-meaning, it is crucial to consider the broader implications of such interference on the natural course of human development and civilization.

The Natural Pace of Development

Human development, both individual and societal, has always progressed at a natural pace. This natural progression is essential for the harmonious evolution of our species. Each stage of development, whether in childhood or in societal advancement, serves a specific purpose in preparing for future challenges.

Natural Development:

  • Individual Growth: Each child develops at their own pace, with unique strengths and abilities. This diversity is essential for a resilient and adaptable society.
  • Societal Evolution: Societies evolve through the contributions of diverse minds, including those who think differently, such as autistic and ADHD individuals. These contributions have historically driven innovation and progress.

The Impact of Early Intervention

Early intervention strategies like ABA aim to modify behaviors in autistic children to align with societal norms. While this may seem beneficial on the surface, it often disregards the natural development and unique strengths of these individuals.

Consequences of ABA:

  • Suppression of Natural Abilities: ABA often focuses on eliminating behaviors deemed undesirable, potentially suppressing the unique abilities and strengths of autistic individuals.
  • Time-Altering Effects: By interfering with the natural development of autistic individuals, we may be altering the course of human advancement. The unique contributions of these individuals, which could drive significant progress, are at risk of being diminished.
  • Generational Impact: The widespread use of early intervention strategies affects not just individuals but entire generations. The long-term impact on society’s ability to innovate and adapt is a concern.

The Role of Autistic and ADHD Individuals in Civilization

Autistic and ADHD individuals have played a crucial role in the advancement of human civilization. Their unique ways of thinking, problem-solving abilities, and intense focus have led to groundbreaking discoveries and innovations.

Contributions to Society:

  • Innovation and Creativity: Autistic and ADHD individuals often excel in areas requiring deep focus and attention to detail. Their contributions to science, technology, and the arts have been invaluable.
  • Problem Solving: Their ability to approach problems from unique perspectives allows for innovative solutions that others might not consider.
  • Natural Diversity: The diversity of thought and ability within the human population is crucial for a resilient and adaptable society.

The Broader Implications

Interfering with the natural development of autistic individuals through strategies like ABA can have far-reaching consequences for society as a whole. It is essential to recognize and respect the natural pace of development and the unique contributions that neurodiverse individuals bring to the table.

Respecting Natural Processes:

  • Holistic Approaches: Instead of focusing solely on behavior modification, holistic approaches that nurture the strengths of autistic individuals should be adopted.
  • Valuing Diversity: Society must learn to value and integrate diverse ways of thinking and being, recognizing that these differences drive progress and innovation.
  • Long-Term Perspective: Understanding that the short-term gains of early intervention may come at the cost of long-term societal advancement is crucial.

Conclusion

The natural progression of human development and societal evolution is a complex and delicate process. Interfering with this process through early intervention strategies like ABA can have unintended consequences, potentially altering the course of human advancement. By recognizing and valuing the unique contributions of autistic and ADHD individuals, we can ensure a more innovative, resilient, and adaptable future for all.

Do you see?

Autism

Autistic Toddler Regression

Leave a comment

Cognitive Trade-Off in Autism: A Necessary Adaptation

In children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), a phenomenon often referred to as “regression” can be observed, typically between the ages of 15 to 30 months. During this period, some children may lose previously acquired skills, particularly in language and social interactions. However, this “regression” should not be viewed as a simple loss of skills but rather as a cognitive trade-off necessary for the brain’s adaptation and development.

Brain Development from 9 to 24 Months

During the first two years of life, a child’s brain undergoes significant changes:

  1. 9 to 12 Months:
    • Motor Skills: Development of crawling, standing, and initial steps. Fine motor skills improve, allowing for better object manipulation.
    • Cognitive Skills: Object permanence is understood. Imitation and early problem-solving skills begin to emerge.
    • Social and Emotional Skills: Strengthening of attachment bonds, increased interaction with caregivers, and early social communication attempts.
  2. 12 to 18 Months:
    • Motor Skills: Walking becomes more stable. Fine motor skills continue to develop, enabling tasks like stacking blocks or scribbling.
    • Cognitive Skills: Rapid vocabulary growth, though not uniform across all children. Increased exploration and curiosity.
    • Social Skills: More complex interactions with caregivers and peers. Early signs of empathy and understanding of social norms.
  3. 18 to 24 Months:
    • Motor Skills: Running, climbing, and improved coordination. Fine motor skills include drawing shapes and using utensils.
    • Cognitive Skills: Further language development, though some children may show variability. Improved memory and recognition skills.
    • Social Skills: More sophisticated play, including pretend play. Increased independence and assertion of preferences.

The Concept of Cognitive Trade-Off

The term “regression” suggests a loss of previously acquired skills. However, it is more accurate to describe this as a cognitive trade-off. Here’s how it works:

  1. Resource Allocation:
    • The brain has a finite amount of resources (neural energy, attention, etc.) to allocate toward various developmental tasks.
    • During periods of intense growth, such as the development of motor skills or sensory processing, the brain may prioritize these areas over others, such as language.
  2. Sensory Overload and Filtering:
    • Children with autism often experience the world differently, with sensory information being overwhelming and unfiltered.
    • To manage this influx of information, the brain may divert resources to developing coping mechanisms, such as sensory processing strategies, at the expense of language skills.
  3. Neural Pruning and Connectivity:
    • Neural pruning is a natural process where the brain eliminates excess neurons and synapses to increase efficiency.
    • This process is critical in focusing on the most important skills for survival and adaptation at a given developmental stage.

Cognitive Trade-Off in Action

During the so-called regression period:

  • Language Skills: Children may appear to lose language skills as their brain focuses on other critical areas.
  • Motor Skills and Sensory Processing: These may develop more rapidly as the brain works on filtering and managing sensory input.
  • Social Skills: Interactions may change as the child prioritizes understanding and navigating their environment.

Conclusion

Understanding “regression” as a cognitive trade-off rather than a loss can shift our perspective on autism. It highlights the brain’s adaptability and prioritization in response to the unique needs of a developing child with autism. By acknowledging this, caregivers and professionals can better support children’s development, focusing on creating environments that minimize sensory overload and encourage balanced growth across all areas.

Autism

Social Genocide

Leave a comment

Beyond Bias: The Systematic Disregard of Autistic Individuals and Its Dire Consequences

Autistic individuals often face systemic discrimination and mistreatment, far beyond mere bias. This mistreatment spans various aspects of society, from law enforcement and legal systems to education and everyday interactions. Such pervasive disregard not only undermines the dignity and rights of autistic people but also poses severe consequences for their safety and well-being. This article explores the widespread mistreatment of autistic individuals, the roots of this issue, and the urgent need for societal change.

Irregular Connectivity and Communication Challenges

Autistic individuals have irregular neural connectivity, leading to difficulties in processing information, especially when it is ambiguous or implied. The world communicates not only verbally but also through written and non-verbal cues that can be unclear and confusing for autistic individuals. This irregular connectivity can result in missed steps, confusion, fear, and anger. When society expects autistic individuals to navigate this ambiguous communication effortlessly, it unfairly places the blame on them when they struggle.

The Reality of Systemic Disregard

Law Enforcement

  • Fear of the Unknowns: For autistic individuals, the fear of unknowns can be overwhelming. When faced with high-stress situations, such as interactions with law enforcement, this fear is magnified. Autistic people may struggle to understand and respond to rapidly shouted instructions, leading to dangerous misunderstandings.
  • Example: In high-pressure scenarios, such as a police officer demanding compliance with shouted commands, an autistic individual may not be able to process the instructions quickly enough. This can lead to perceived non-compliance or resistance.
  • Consequence: Such misunderstandings can result in unnecessary use of force, injuries, or even fatalities. In police interview rooms, the inability to understand the nuanced questioning can lead to false confessions or the dismissal of genuine concerns.

Legal Systems

  • Communication Barriers: Autistic individuals often face significant communication challenges, which are frequently misunderstood by legal professionals. This misunderstanding can lead to a lack of proper legal representation and support.
  • Example: An autistic person seeking legal help may struggle with traditional communication methods, resulting in their concerns being ignored or misunderstood by lawyers.
  • Consequence: This can lead to unjust legal outcomes, prolonged distress, and a

lack of recourse for autistic individuals facing legal issues.

Healthcare and Services

  • Sensory Sensitivities: Autistic individuals often have heightened sensory sensitivities, which can make everyday tasks and interactions challenging. When these sensitivities are not understood or accommodated, it leads to significant distress and neglect.
  • Example: In healthcare or service settings, an autistic person may need specific accommodations for sensory sensitivities. Without understanding and support, their needs are often dismissed, leading to inadequate care.
  • Consequence: This neglect can result in deteriorating health and well-being, as well as a lack of trust in essential services.

Education

  • Implied Instructions: Autistic students often struggle with implied instructions and expectations, leading to misunderstandings and unfair academic penalties. Educators may not recognize the need for explicit, clear instructions.
  • Example: Autistic students may answer questions in a way that reflects their unique thinking patterns, which can be misinterpreted by teachers.
  • Consequence: This results in lower grades, academic failure, and a lack of opportunities for further education and career development.

The Role of Early Intervention and ABA

Early intervention programs and Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) have been widely promoted with the intention of helping autistic individuals. However, these programs often contribute to the problem by perpetuating harmful biases and teaching autistic individuals that their natural behaviors are wrong.

  • Misguided Intentions: While early intervention aimed to support autistic children, it often focuses on making them conform to non-autistic norms, leading to internalized shame and a lack of self-acceptance.
  • Harmful Messaging: Early intervention campaigns have driven home the message that autism is a tragedy, something to be feared and mourned. Media portrayals often show families devastated by an autism diagnosis, reinforcing the idea that autism is inherently negative.
  • Corporate Endorsement: Large corporations have supported and perpetuated these narratives, spreading the message that autism is something to be feared and urgently addressed. This has led to a widespread societal belief that autistic individuals are fundamentally flawed or broken.
  • Consequence: These approaches can lead to long-term psychological harm, making it harder for autistic individuals to advocate for themselves and navigate societal systems. The narrative that autistic kids are problematic and do “weird” things contributes to stigma and exclusion.

The Urgent Need for Change

The systematic disregard of autistic individuals is not just a matter of bias; it is a violation of human rights. If autistic people cannot rely on essential services like law enforcement, legal aid, education, and healthcare, their safety and well-being are in jeopardy. This widespread mistreatment must be addressed to prevent further harm and ensure that autistic individuals can live with dignity and respect.

Social Genocide Through Systemic Discrimination

Social genocide, or sociocide, involves the systematic destruction of a group’s social structures, identity, and way of life through systemic discrimination. For the autistic community, this form of genocide manifests in the pervasive efforts to “cure” or eliminate autism rather than understanding and supporting autistic individuals. Autistic people, though not a race, represent a unique neurotype within the human species. Society often focuses on the comorbidities and perceived quality-of-life issues associated with autism, driving research and interventions aimed at eradicating autism rather than improving the lives of autistic individuals. This approach denies autistic people the opportunity to live fulfilling lives and to be accepted as they are. It is hypocritical that in an age of cancel culture, which claims to advocate for justice and equality, society simultaneously contributes to the social genocide of the autistic community by promoting stereotypes, exclusion, and harmful “cures.” This contradiction underscores the urgent need to shift the focus from elimination to acceptance and support, recognizing autistic individuals as valuable members of society who deserve to thrive.

Conclusion

Autistic individuals are valuable members of society who contribute in many ways, yet they face systemic mistreatment that undermines their humanity. It is crucial to recognize and address this issue, demanding change from all societal sectors. By raising awareness and advocating for autistic rights, we can work towards a society where autistic individuals are treated with the respect and understanding they deserve. The future of autistic children depends on our commitment to this change.

Autism

Input Processing

Leave a comment

I found this book at the thrift store today, and it even had the good parts already underlined in pencil for me. Its a great book!

States of Consciousness

States of Consciousness, a classic by world authority Charles T. Tart, is a basic understanding of how the mind is a dynamic, culturally biased, semi-arbitrary construction and system. A systematic exploration of how and why altered states can come about and their possibilities. As a student of h…

Unlocking the Secrets of Consciousness: How Charles Tart’s “States of Consciousness” Illuminates Autistic Sensory Processing

Page 97 & 98 — I was like whaaaat…

In Charles Tart’s “States of Consciousness,” the concept of “Input-Processing” is one of the major subsystems of consciousness. This subsystem automates the selection and abstraction of sensory input, allowing us to perceive only what is considered “important” based on personal and cultural standards​​.

Input-Processing Subsystem: Importance and Function

Overview

The Input-Processing subsystem is crucial because it helps manage the vast amount of sensory information we receive, ensuring that we are not overwhelmed by irrelevant data. This subsystem filters incoming sensory stimuli, highlighting what our brain deems significant while disregarding the rest. This process is highly automated, operating below the level of conscious awareness most of the time.

Importance in Daily Functioning

  1. Efficiency in Perception: By filtering sensory inputs, the Input-Processing subsystem allows us to focus on what is immediately relevant, enhancing our ability to respond effectively to our environment. For example, while walking down a busy street, this subsystem helps us notice traffic signals and pedestrian movements rather than being distracted by every single sound or visual stimulus.
  2. Cultural and Personal Relevance: The criteria for what is considered important are influenced by both personal experiences and cultural norms. This means our perceptions are tailored to what we need to function within our specific cultural context, aiding in social interactions and adherence to societal norms.
  3. Adaptation and Survival: On a more fundamental level, the Input-Processing subsystem is essential for survival. By quickly identifying and prioritizing potential threats or opportunities, this subsystem helps us navigate our environment safely and efficiently.

Parallels to Autistic Perception

In autism, sensory processing can often be atypical, leading to differences in how sensory input is filtered and prioritized:

  1. Hyper- and Hypo-Sensitivity: Many autistic individuals experience either heightened sensitivity (hyper-sensitivity) or reduced sensitivity (hypo-sensitivity) to sensory stimuli. This can mean that the Input-Processing subsystem may either filter out too little, resulting in sensory overload, or too much, leading to missed important cues.
  2. Different Criteria for Relevance: The standards for what is deemed “important” sensory input can differ significantly from neurotypical norms. Autistic individuals might focus intensely on details that others might overlook and find overwhelming stimuli that others can easily ignore.
  3. Impact on Daily Life: These differences in sensory processing can significantly impact daily functioning. For instance, in a noisy environment, an autistic person might struggle with overwhelming auditory input that their Input-Processing subsystem cannot filter out efficiently. This can lead to anxiety, stress, and a need for sensory accommodations to create a more manageable environment.

Teaching and Understanding: A Precursor to ABA

Tart’s exploration in “States of Consciousness” predates the development of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) and offers insights into sensory processing that can be seen as inadvertently teaching how to experience the world in an “autistic” way. By delving deeply into how sensory input is processed and filtered, Tart’s work can help neurotypical individuals understand and perhaps even adopt certain aspects of autistic sensory experiences as a means of self-discovery and personal growth.

Finding Oneself Through Sensory Awareness

Tart’s systems approach suggests that by understanding and manipulating our sensory input processing, we can achieve altered states of consciousness that lead to self-discovery. This is akin to experiencing the world as an autistic person might, with heightened awareness of sensory details and a different prioritization of stimuli. Such an approach can broaden one’s understanding of consciousness and the human experience, offering a path to deeper self-awareness and personal insight.

Conclusion

Tart’s detailed exploration of how the mind processes and filters sensory input provides valuable insights for understanding autistic sensory experiences. Recognizing the variability in sensory processing and the potential for overload can help appreciate the challenges faced by autistic individuals. This understanding can inform strategies to create supportive environments that minimize sensory distress and enhance well-being. Tart’s work essentially teaches elements of autistic sensory processing as a method for finding oneself, predating ABA and highlighting the importance of sensory awareness in personal development.