Anchoring Bias and Autism: The Impact of Cognitive and Social Constructs on Autism Research

Anchoring bias occurs when initial information or assumptions disproportionately influence subsequent judgments and decisions. In autism research, this often manifests as interpretations and interventions based on neurotypical standards, potentially misaligning with the unique needs of autistic individuals.

Impact on Research and Intervention Approaches The application of anchoring bias in autism research has influenced diagnostic and assessment frameworks and the development of therapeutic interventions, such as Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). Traditionally, ABA has emphasized the acquisition of social skills, aligning autistic behaviours with neurotypical norms rather than focusing on the intrinsic strengths and needs of autistic individuals.

The Consequences for the Autistic Community One significant outcome of this biased approach is the predominant focus of ABA therapy on social skills training, which do not align with the primary developmental needs of autistic individuals. Research suggests that autistic brains may benefit more from systemizing approaches. This method helps make sense of overwhelming sensory and cognitive input before addressing social skills. Introducing social skills prematurely may overload the cognitive processing capabilities of autistic individuals, potentially hindering or stunting their natural developmental trajectory.

Systemizing Before Socializing The emphasis on premature social skills training through ABA might have inadvertently neglected the development of systemizing skills, which are crucial for autistic individuals to effectively manage and interpret their environments. Systemizing allows for a structured understanding of environmental inputs, essential before tackling social interactions’ more abstract and unpredictable nature.

The Need for a Shift in Research and Practice

• Reevaluation of ABA Therapy: There is a growing call within the community to pause and critically evaluate the long-term effectiveness and impact of ABA therapy on autistic development. This reevaluation should consider whether the focus on social adaptability has been at the expense of more critical cognitive and sensory processing skills.
• Further Studies to Address Anchoring Bias: Additional research is needed to confirm whether anchoring biases have led to ineffective or potentially harmful intervention strategies. This research should aim to redefine autism intervention from a perspective that values autistic ways of interacting with the world as different but not deficient.
• Inclusion of Autistic Voices in Research: Incorporating insights from autistic individuals, including researchers, can provide a more accurate representation of autism. This inclusion helps to ensure that research and therapies are designed with an understanding of autistic experiences and needs.

Conclusion Acknowledging and addressing the influence of anchoring bias is crucial for advancing autism research and intervention strategies. By reassessing the role and outcomes of therapies like ABA, the research community can better support the neurological diversity of the autistic population. The ultimate goal should be to develop interventions that respect and enhance the natural learning processes of autistic individuals, rather than conforming them to an external standard of normalcy.